Salesforce Staff Augmentation
A whole seat set rather than one person — admins, developers, QA, business analysts and architects placed inside your team, reporting to your leads and working your board.
01
The problem
Why people call us about this.
A
You need four roles filled and hiring all of them takes the better part of a year.
B
A long roadmap keeps slipping because the team is one deep in every discipline.
C
Contract staff arrive, ship, and leave nothing anyone can maintain.
02
What’s covered
The Salesforce we actually configure.
Team extension, not an outsourced project. The people are ours contractually and yours operationally, which is the arrangement that actually works when the roadmap is long.
03
How it runs
Five phases, and what you see at the end of each.
01 · Week 1
Inventory
What exists, who owns it, and which system is really the source of truth. Almost always surfaces something nobody knew was live.
A written map
02 · Weeks 2–3
Contract
The design in writing, with each decision and its reversal cost named. This is where we argue with the brief — before money is spent.
A signed scope
03 · Middle
Build
Built against the contract and reviewed against it. You see working software every two weeks, in your own sandbox.
Fortnightly demos
04 · Late
Prove
Volume testing at twice expected load, deliberate failure injection, and a replay run with your team watching.
A test evidence pack
05 · Final week
Hand over
Runbook, monitoring, escalation path and a named owner on your side — then a month watching it together before we step back.
Runbook and owner
04
First call
Thirty minutes. Three answers.
You speak to a certified architect, not a sales engineer. No deck, no discovery fee, and no obligation to go further — you leave the call with three things whether you hire us or not.
Whether this is even the right line
About a third of the time it is not, and we say so. Usually the ask is custom development when the real problem sits in the data model underneath.
A shape and a range
Roughly how long, roughly how many people, and the band it falls in. The firm number follows discovery about two weeks later, and it holds.
The two risks we would flag
The things most likely to blow the timeline on a project like yours — named on the call, before anyone has signed anything.
Book it for this week.
Pick a slot directly in the calendar — most questions get answered inside the thirty minutes.
05
FAQ
Asked on nearly every call.
How is this different from Developer on Demand?
Breadth. Developer on Demand is one certified developer in your sprints; staff augmentation fills a set of seats — admin, developer, QA, analyst, architect — so a long roadmap stops being one deep in every discipline.
Who do they report to?
Your leads, in your ceremonies, against your definition of done. They are ours contractually and yours operationally, which is the only version of this arrangement that actually works.
Can we scale the team up or down?
Monthly, with thirty days’ notice either way. We would rather resize than have you carry seats you are not using, because that is how these arrangements quietly sour.
What stops knowledge walking out when someone rotates?
Documented handover is part of the contract, not a favour at the end. Every rotation includes an overlap period and written context, and our architects hold the thread across changes.
Other lines